Issues with Dutch cable provider UPC

UPC unhappy logoUPC is a service provider for Internet, television and telephone in the Netherlands. I don’t like UPC and I’m going to tell you why. If you are not interested you can stop reading now, but I need to get this of my chest.


Why UPC is a bad service provider (in random order)…

  • Since recently, UPC forces non-resolving domain requests to their default(!) DNS servers with a request that resolves to a web page that 302 http redirects you to their own “search” engine. So if you mistype a domain name, your browser redirects you, thereby invading your privacy and providing you with their full-banner “helper”-webpage. This is against the DNS protocol.
    You can solve it by forcing your IP’s to use another set of DNS servers. For me this means I have to manually configure each network device because I cannot make my Thomson router distribute specific DNS host adresses via DHCP :(
    This site tells you more about the solution where you have to manually set your DNS servers.
  • I have a ‘royal subscription’ which means I get nine HD (High Definition) channels for 10 euro/month extra. UPC offers you another feature with this Royal subscription that is called Video On Demand (VOD). The feature is nice because they provide you with a lot of nice content (like series) that are watchable on demand, just like a dvd.
    The problem is that it  often doesn’t work for me, giving me a VOD 103 exception. I’ve contacted support three times now about this issue and they still haven’t manage to locate the problem. Every time I have to convince them my signal is ok (using a special test-channel). The problem is probably caused due to a under capacity at their streaming servers, but people at the support desk simply follow protocol and never find the problem so it never gets fixed.
  • I have a subscription where I have a combined box for telephone, internet (24 MBit) and (HD) television. I don’t want the phone, but I cannot just order only internet and television. I don’t want to pay for this crappy phone line that doesn’t allow me to dial +31(0)87 numbers (voip phone land-lines in the Netherlands). Another irritating issue is that when your broadband cable modem has no connection, people calling your number get a normal “phone is ringing”-tone on their side, and not a “number not reachable”-tone, which doesn’t help finding the problem.
    Besides that UPC tries to sell this product as a normal phone line, but instead it’s a very error-prone telephone line that you should not primarily rely on when you might need to call the alarm-number.
  • My (brand new) black colored ‘Media Box’ that provides me with HD television seems unstable. Sometimes – out of nothing – the screen just turns black, while sounds continues. Remote control activities don’t work any more and the device get’s locked. In this case the device needs a power-cable off and on, which costs me at least 60 seconds before the television get’s back. Not funny when you were watching ‘time shifted’.
    I’ve also seen issues where the device automatically switches to the (of all channels) interactive ‘UPC’ channel, functionally “disabling” the number pad on your remote control so it will take you some time to get back to the non-interactive TV channels, while losing ‘time-shifted’ data as well. The remote control is not the problem (I’m using the Logitech Harmony nowadays), and there are numerous people on forums complaining about issues with the UPC media devices as well.
    I’m silently hoping they push a ‘all-problems-fixing’-firmware update soon.
  • UPC poisons their DNS servers with a blacklist so they can block domains hosting child pornography. The problem with this is that they are not open about it, so they they manipulate your DNS requests without telling you about it. I wrote an article about that case specifically.
  • The Internet connection UPC provides is slow during evening hours and has connection dropouts very often. When I switch my Internet connection to another provider to check if it’s a local network issue, the connection is always back and better.
  • With my subscription, they do not allow me to pay ‘manually’ with so called ‘accept giros’, instead they forced my to use automatic credit payment where they are in complete control. So if they make a mistake, It’s up to me to get the money back. Isn’t this against the law?
  • UPC violates your privacy. When you keep your default password, they get it in clear text on their screen at the help desk. If you play it nice, they’ll tell it to you. This endangers your privacy because it is the password that is also used for the mail account they offer you and provides you access to their service center where you can order new services as well. Don’t use their mail account if you  are concerned about your privacy.
  • Something positive on the contrary is that they offer a very fast internet connection for almost the same price as you were already paying, an action that was just launched recently. The disadvantage of this is that their network gets more load, something that could explain the continuous connection drop-outs I’m continuously experiencing. They don’t seem to be prepared for Internet speed upgrades with their network.
  • When you call UPC on their special 0900-number, they charge a high price, especially when calling from a mobile phone. When you telephone line from UPC is dead, you cannot use their phone, so you are mostly stuck to a mobile phone.
    The high calling rate is not fancy, but I find it quite ok, because it prevents the waiting time due to customers only calling when they really have to. Still, their waiting time on average is too long, in my experience (> 5 minutes average).
    Besides that, when you call them, it takes you at least 2 minutes before you get through their menu, every time. Sigh.
    A refund for callers – if the problem is theirs – would be nice.
  • You cannot quit your contract with UPC whenever you want, you are stuck with them for at least one year. It’s not only UPC that plays this trick on you, there are other providers that do this to you as well.

So why do I still use UPC?

The reason for me still using UPC  is that they are the only provider offering HD television to my home. Besides that my ADSL line doesn’t seem to be capable for high speed Internet access (meaning 8 MBit+ downstream), and I want a reasonable upload speed as well.

If there is another provider for my region available that includes HD television and fast internet access, I’ll switch immediately.

The blocking of child pornography in the Netherlands

Internet censorship is a hot topic nowadays, even here in the Netherlands. A lot is written about the Dutch government trying to reduce the accessibility and distribution of child pornography over the Internet, which is in general a good thing. A bad thing, on the contrary, is the way in which they try to do that, knowing about the Great Firewall of China.

I, as a curious Dutch citizen want to test what my government is doing to my Internet accessibility, after hearing rumors of blocks being applied. And to be very honest, I am also interested in the technical solution.
So, where do you start if you want to test this? Well, not with a Dutch government site where the magic black list is hosted of course, but by just reading slashdot.org that links you (indirectly) to wikileaks.org where a list of pages blocked by the Danish government was posted:
https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Denmark:_3863_sites_on_censorship_list%2C_Feb_2008
Gosh, I wonder if this list might point me to some sites that are blocked in the Netherlands as well…

So, I started looking up url’s in the list at random. Most of them appear to be bogus sites, captured by domain hijackers and filled with total nonsense. But after 10 clicks or so, I found a website that was blocked: www dot am using – ki ds dot com. When opening this site via Dutch ISP UPC, I find the page to be on the Dutch black list, resulting in a “STOP” warning, as you can see here:

stop_childporn

(the page doesn’t look very professional, which shows similarities to the technical solution that is used to block websites)

A remarkable thing is, that when I make a request for the site via dutch ISP XS4ALL, (I happen to have two Internet connections at my disposal) the site isn’t blocked at all. I know XS4ALL criticizes the way this filtering is implemented, but not blocking access to the site…
Well, it could be that they just have a more recent version of the black list already, who knows. But still, I’m curious whether other Dutch ISP’s like Tiscali, Planet, KPN and even SurfNet (a provider for educational and research facilities) block this site and others do not…
Update: I found out the blocking is an ongoing experiment in which UPC participates.

Above all of this, I very much agree child porn should be stopped because it harms children, but not by bringing down the Freedom of Speech and the Internet, while not solving the underlying problem at all. If there has to be a black list for the common Internet surfer (by that I mean that it helps against the creation and distribution of child pornography), then so be it.
But why can’t it be an open list, a list that is verifiable by everyone on the world, and a list that is used only for blocking what is considered real child pornography hosted on servers that cannot be taken down otherwise (because the server is located in a country where the Dutch government has no jurisdiction). The list should not be abused for blocking anything else but child pornography.

This obvious risk here is that the owner of the list might abuse it for blocking content that is unrelated to child pornography, but for example (seemingly) illegal content (warez) or blog posts with undesirable political content.

The problem with child pornography is way bigger then the Internet. Censoring the Internet in the current way it is done is not really going to do any good against child abusers. So why spend taxes on this solution that is probably not solving anything? Wouldn’t it be more effective to try and find the people creating and distributing the CP?

Access to whatever material cannot be blocked unless you apply strategies like described in Orwell’s 1984, where you have total control over people, where in this case you apply total control over the way in which the Internet can be accessed. The nature of the Internet makes this practically impossible without severely limiting ones freedom on the Internet, thus block a few sites by poisoning the ISP’s DNS server, like is currently done, is not going to work.

Governments should invest in catching the sick people creating and distributing the CP. As I see it, that is not done by obfuscating DNS request. IMHO the collateral damage violates the privacy and freedom of the common Internet user.

If you want to view the Dutch “STOP” website, you can just visit it:
http://212.142.48.139 (please note the stop sign, it animates, so cool)